Appearance
Operations Framework: Multi-Host Invalidation, CQRS, and Reliable Command Processing
The Operations Framework (OF) provides a robust foundation for building distributed systems with Fusion. It solves several critical challenges that arise when running multiple instances of an application:
- Multi-host cache invalidation: When data changes on one server, all other servers must invalidate their cached computed values
- Reliable command processing: Commands must be executed exactly once, even in the face of failures
- Event-driven architecture: Commands can produce events that are processed asynchronously with guaranteed delivery
Why Do You Need Operations Framework?
Consider a typical multi-server deployment:
When a user on Server A updates their profile:
- Server A writes to the database and invalidates its local cache
- Servers B and C still have stale data in their caches
- Users connected to B and C see outdated information
Without Operations Framework, you'd have to implement:
- A message queue or pub/sub system for cross-server notifications
- Retry logic for failed operations
- Deduplication to prevent processing the same operation twice
- Transaction handling to ensure atomicity
With Operations Framework, all of this is handled automatically.
Required Packages
| Package | Purpose |
|---|---|
| ActualLab.Fusion | Core OF abstractions and in-memory implementation |
| ActualLab.Fusion.EntityFramework | EF Core implementation: DbOperationScope, operation logging, DbContext integration |
| ActualLab.Fusion.EntityFramework.Npgsql | PostgreSQL: NpgsqlOperationLogWatcher for LISTEN/NOTIFY |
| ActualLab.Fusion.EntityFramework.Redis | Redis: RedisOperationLogWatcher for pub/sub notifications |
TIP
The base ActualLab.Fusion.EntityFramework package includes FileSystemOperationLogWatcher which works with any database but requires shared filesystem access. For production multi-host deployments, use database-specific watchers (Npgsql) or Redis.
The Outbox Pattern
Operations Framework implements the Transactional Outbox Pattern – a well-known solution for reliable messaging in distributed systems.
The Problem
In distributed systems, you often need to:
- Update your database
- Publish a message/event to notify other services
But what if step 2 fails after step 1 succeeds? You have inconsistent state.
The Solution: Outbox Pattern
Instead of publishing directly, write the message to an "outbox" table in the same transaction as your business data:
This guarantees at-least-once delivery: if the transaction commits, the operation will eventually be processed. If it fails, nothing is written.
How OF Implements It
- DbOperationScope wraps your command in a database transaction
- DbOperation entity stores the operation in the same transaction
- DbOperationLogReader (background service) watches for new operations
- Operation Log Watchers provide instant notifications (PostgreSQL NOTIFY, Redis Pub/Sub, etc.)
- OperationCompletionNotifier triggers invalidation on all hosts
Core Concepts
Operation
An Operation is the durable record of a completed command: the command itself, the invalidation calls it recorded, and the events it produced. Other hosts read that record and apply those calls - nothing is replayed. Currently only commands act as operations, but the framework is designed to support other types in the future.
Key properties:
Uuid– Unique identifierHostId– The server that executed the operationCommand– The command that was executedInvalidationCalls– The calls applied after this operation completes, on every host that reads itEvents– Events produced by this operation
Both lists are immutable, and both can be shaped from a handler before the commit:
| Member | What it does |
|---|---|
AddInvalidationCall(call) | Appends one recorded call; returns the operation, so calls chain |
AddInvalidationCalls(...) | Appends several – params ReadOnlySpan<ServiceCall> or an IEnumerable<ServiceCall> |
RemoveInvalidationCall(call) | Removes that call, returning whether it was there |
RemoveInvalidationCalls() | Drops all of them |
RemoveInvalidationCalls(predicate) | Drops the ones the predicate matches |
AddEvent(...) | Appends an event – from a value, a uuid and a value, an IOperationEventSource, or an OperationEvent |
RemoveEvent(event) / RemoveEvent(uuid) | Removes one event, returning whether it was there |
RemoveEvents() / RemoveEvents(predicate) | Drops all events, or the matching ones |
You rarely need these: Invalidation.Defer(...) is what records invalidation calls, and AddEvent(...) is the normal way to raise an event. They exist for the cases where a handler wants to inspect or edit what it is about to commit – dropping an invalidation a nested command already covered, say.
A ServiceCall compares by reference rather than by content, so RemoveInvalidationCall removes the instance you hand it, not an equal-looking one. Use ServiceCall.ContentEqualityComparer.Instance to compare two calls by what they invoke.
The event members need an active, non-transient scope and throw otherwise – a transient operation cannot carry events. The invalidation-call members have no such requirement: a recorded call is just data.
Operation Scope
An Operation Scope provides the context for operation execution:
- DbOperationScope: Persistent operations stored in database (default for database commands)
- TransientOperationScope: Transient operations that don't persist (for in-memory commands)
Deferred Invalidation Mode
A handler declares what its mutation invalidated by calling Invalidation.Defer(...), which registers a block to run after the mutation commits. The handler's invalidation mode decides how far those blocks reach: the origin host only (Local), every host (Replicated), or the host that owns each value (Distributed). There is no default – a handler that defers a block must carry [DeferredInvalidationMode(...)], or the call throws. See Invalidation Modes.
Quick Start
1. Add DbSet for Operations
cs
public DbSet<DbOperation> Operations { get; protected set; } = null!;
public DbSet<DbEvent> Events { get; protected set; } = null!;2. Configure Services
cs
public static void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services, IHostEnvironment Env)
{
services.AddDbContextServices<AppDbContext>(db => {
// Uncomment if you'll be using AddRedisOperationLogWatcher
// db.AddRedisDb("127.0.0.1", "FusionDocumentation.PartO");
db.AddOperations(operations => {
// This call enabled Operations Framework (OF) for AppDbContext.
operations.ConfigureOperationLogReader(_ => new() {
// We use AddFileSystemOperationLogWatcher, so unconditional wake up period
// can be arbitrary long – all depends on the reliability of Notifier-Monitor chain.
// See what .ToRandom does – most of timeouts in Fusion settings are RandomTimeSpan-s,
// but you can provide a normal one too – there is an implicit conversion from it.
CheckPeriod = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(Env.IsDevelopment() ? 60 : 5).ToRandom(0.05),
});
// Optionally enable file-based operation log watcher
operations.AddFileSystemOperationLogWatcher();
// Or, if you use PostgreSQL, use this instead of above line
// operations.AddNpgsqlOperationLogWatcher();
// Or, if you use Redis, use this instead of above line
// operations.AddRedisOperationLogWatcher();
});
});
}Note: OF works solely on the server side, so you don't need similar configuration in your Blazor WebAssembly client.
3. Create Command and Handler
cs
public record PostMessageCommand(Session Session, string Text) : ICommand<ChatMessage>;cs
[CommandHandler]
[DeferredInvalidationMode(DeferredInvalidationMode.Local)]
public virtual async Task<ChatMessage> PostMessage(
PostMessageCommand command, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
await using var dbContext = await DbHub.CreateOperationDbContext(cancellationToken);
// Actual code...
var message = await PostMessageImpl(dbContext, command, cancellationToken);
Invalidation.Defer(() => _ = PseudoGetAnyChatTail());
return message;
}Command Handler Structure
A command handler with Operations Framework follows this pattern:
cs
[CommandHandler]
[DeferredInvalidationMode(DeferredInvalidationMode.Local)]
public virtual async Task<TResult> HandleCommand(
TCommand command, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
// 1. MUTATE
await using var dbContext = await DbHub.CreateOperationDbContext(cancellationToken);
// Perform your business logic
var result = await DoWork(dbContext, command, cancellationToken);
await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync(cancellationToken);
// 2. DECLARE THE INVALIDATION - the block runs after the commit
Invalidation.Defer(() => {
_ = GetSomeData(command.Id, default);
_ = GetRelatedData(command.RelatedId, default);
});
return result;
}Key Points
virtualmodifier – Required for Fusion's proxy generation[CommandHandler]attribute – Registers this method as a command handlerCreateOperationDbContext– Creates a DbContext that participates in the operation scopeInvalidation.Defer(...)– May be called any number of times, anywhere in the handler; the blocks run in registration order, after the mutation commits, onCancellationToken.None
Don't spawn background work from inside an invalidation block
A deferred block (and any synchronous Invalidated event handler) runs inside an Invalidation.Begin() scope. That scope is AsyncLocal-based, so if you start a Task.Run or similar background work from within it, the spawned work inherits the same ambient invalidation context even after the block exits. Any compute method it calls will silently skip computation and invalidate instead – see Computed.BeginIsolation() for the guardrail.
Conditional Invalidation
What to invalidate often depends on what the mutation discovered. A deferred block is an ordinary closure, so that's just a captured local:
cs
[CommandHandler]
[DeferredInvalidationMode(DeferredInvalidationMode.Local)]
public virtual async Task SignOut(
SignOutCommand command, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
await using var dbContext = await DbHub.CreateOperationDbContext(cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
var dbSessionInfo = await Sessions.FindOrCreate(dbContext, command.Session, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
var sessionInfo = dbSessionInfo.ToModel();
if (sessionInfo.IsSignOutForced)
return;
// ...
// What to invalidate depends on what the mutation found, so it's an ordinary closure
Invalidation.Defer(() => {
_ = GetUser(sessionInfo.UserId, default);
_ = GetUserSessions(sessionInfo.UserId, default);
});
}A block observes the final value of a captured local, not its value at the Defer(...) call site – ordinary closure semantics, but easy to trip over when the call reads as if it runs in place. Snapshot into a fresh local if you need the earlier value.
Testing Invalidation
Dependency propagation invalidates every transitive dependant of a call automatically, but it can't invent an invalidation for a directly affected call that a handler's deferred block forgot to enumerate. Nothing catches that at compile time – a query added later, a changed data dependency, or a broad aggregate query that isn't obviously "related" to the command can silently fall out of sync with reality.
The mitigation isn't an analyzer (the design space is too broad for one to pay off yet) – it's a test convention: for every mutating command, write a test that proves it invalidates both the entity-specific query it targets and any aggregate query whose result depends on the same data.
cs
public record KeyValueService_Set(string Key, string Value) : ICommand<Unit>;cs
[DeferredInvalidationMode(DeferredInvalidationMode.Local)]
public class KeyValueService : IComputeService
{
private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, string> _values = new();
// Entity-specific query
[ComputeMethod]
public virtual Task<string?> Get(string key, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
=> Task.FromResult(_values.GetValueOrDefault(key));
// Aggregate query
[ComputeMethod]
public virtual Task<int> Count(CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
=> Task.FromResult(_values.Count);
[CommandHandler]
public virtual Task<Unit> Set(KeyValueService_Set command, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
// Requests an operation scope, so this in-memory command commits like a stored
// one does -- see TransientOperationScopeProvider
TransientOperationScope.Require();
_values[command.Key] = command.Value;
// Every mutating command handler must invalidate BOTH the entity-specific
// query it directly affects AND every aggregate query whose result may change --
// dependency tracking alone won't discover an omitted root call.
Invalidation.Defer(() => {
_ = Get(command.Key, default);
_ = Count(default);
});
return Task.FromResult(Unit.Default);
}
}Capture both computed values before calling the command, then assert both got invalidated:
cs
var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddFusion().AddComputeService<KeyValueService>();
var sp = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var commander = sp.Commander();
var kv = sp.GetRequiredService<KeyValueService>();
// Capture both queries BEFORE the mutating command runs
var cGet = await Computed.Capture(() => kv.Get("a"));
var cCount = await Computed.Capture(() => kv.Count());
WriteLine($"Before Set: Get.IsConsistent={cGet.IsConsistent()}, Count.IsConsistent={cCount.IsConsistent()}");
await commander.Call(new KeyValueService_Set("a", "1"));
// A test would assert both are False here -- if Set() only invalidated
// Get(), this would (correctly) fail and catch the missing Count() invalidation
WriteLine($"After Set: Get.IsConsistent={cGet.IsConsistent()}, Count.IsConsistent={cCount.IsConsistent()}");The output:
text
Before Set: Get.IsConsistent=True, Count.IsConsistent=True
After Set: Get.IsConsistent=False, Count.IsConsistent=FalseIf Set's deferred block only called Get(command.Key, default) and forgot Count(default), this test would catch it immediately: Count.IsConsistent would stay True after the command completes. Without the test, that gap would surface later as a UI aggregate (a count, a list, a total) that never updates, with nothing in the logs pointing at the cause.
Nested Commands
When one command calls another, the nested handler's deferred blocks join the same operation:
cs
[CommandHandler]
[DeferredInvalidationMode(DeferredInvalidationMode.Local)]
public virtual async Task<Order> CreateOrder(
CreateOrderCommand command, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
await using var dbContext = await DbHub.CreateOperationDbContext(cancellationToken);
var order = new Order { /* ... */ };
dbContext.Orders.Add(order);
await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync(cancellationToken);
// The nested command declares its own invalidation, deferred into this operation
await Commander.Call(new SendOrderConfirmationCommand(order.Id), cancellationToken);
Invalidation.Defer(() => _ = GetOrder(command.OrderId, default));
return order;
}One operation gets one capture scope, and its mode comes from the first handler that defers a block – not from the outermost command. A handler that defers nothing never gets a say, and two handlers that need different modes fail rather than one of them being silently narrowed – see Nested Commands.
Command Pipeline
Operations Framework adds several filtering handlers to the command pipeline:
| Priority | Handler | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 999,999,000 | InvalidationGuard | Throws if a command is started inside an invalidation pass |
| 100,000 | OperationReprocessor | Retries commands that fail with transient errors |
| 10,000 | TransientOperationScopeProvider | Provides transient scope, runs completion |
| 9,900 | DbOperationScopeProvider | Provides database scope for each DbContext type |
| 9,000 | DeferredInvalidationScopeProvider | Opens the deferred invalidation scope |
| -1,000,000,000 | CompletionTerminator | Terminal handler for ICompletion |
Invariants and Guarantees
Invalidation blocks and completion listeners must not fail
Deferred invalidation and OperationCompletionNotifier's dispatch to IOperationCompletionListeners both catch every exception, log it, and otherwise treat the operation as fully processed – a failed invalidation block or a failed listener is not retried, and (on the originating host) it's never revisited within the same process lifetime. The mutation has already committed by then, so failing the command isn't an option either.
This is a deliberate design trade-off, but it rests on a hard, mostly-unenforced contract: invalidation logic and completion listeners must not fail. Concretely, that means:
- Deferred blocks and any compute method they transitively call must be synchronous or otherwise guaranteed to complete, side-effect-free, and independent of failure-prone infrastructure (no I/O that can legitimately fail).
- Custom
IOperationCompletionListenerimplementations must not throw under any input they can reasonably observe.
If this contract is violated, the swallowed exception is your only signal, and the corresponding invalidation (or completion notification) is simply lost for that operation. When writing either kind of code, test it explicitly against failure scenarios you'd otherwise rely on retry semantics to paper over – retries are not coming. The invalidation.deferred.failure.count counter is what surfaces a block that threw.
Completion listener delivery is at-least-once
For operations delivered by the log reader (i.e. everything except the originating host's in-process notification), IOperationCompletionListener dispatch is at-least-once, not exactly-once. When a listener fails, the reader redelivers the whole operation; on a crash–restart it also re-reads every operation still within StartOffset. Redelivery re-runs all listeners registered for that operation – including the ones that already succeeded on the previous attempt, since the reader tracks progress per operation, not per listener. Listeners with external side effects must therefore be idempotent, keyed off Operation.Uuid (or an equivalent per-event key) so a re-run is a no-op.
Command completion isn't a cluster-wide freshness boundary
After a command's transaction commits, invalidation still has to pass through local completion handling, watcher notification (or the poll fallback), application of the operation's recorded invalidation calls on every other host, and – for RPC clients – a further Invalidate message. During that interval, another host or a connected client can legitimately observe a cached pre-command value. This is intentional eventual consistency, not a bug: Commander.Call returning does not mean every dependent cache cluster-wide has been invalidated.
If a caller needs cross-host read-your-write semantics (e.g., "the very next read on any host must see this write"), command completion alone doesn't provide it – that requires an explicit version or synchronization mechanism layered on top (e.g., threading a version/timestamp through the response and having the reader wait for a computed at least that fresh).
Backend Commands
Commands that should only execute on the server should implement IBackendCommand:
cs
public record DeleteUserCommand(UserId UserId) : ICommand<Unit>, IBackendCommand;This ensures:
- The command can only be processed by backend servers
- Client-side proxies won't attempt to handle it
- RPC layer enforces server-side execution
Further Reading
- Invalidation Modes – Deferred, replicated, and distributed invalidation
- Events – Producing and consuming events from operations
- Transient Operations and Reprocessing – In-memory operations and retry logic
- Configuration Options – All configuration options explained
- Log Watchers – PostgreSQL, Redis, FileSystem log watchers
- Diagrams – Visual representations of OF internals
- Cheat Sheet – Quick reference
Learning More
To explore OF's internals, check out:
HostId
HostId identifies each process in your cluster. It includes:
- Machine name
- Unique process ID
- Unique ID per IoC container (useful for testing)
This allows OF to determine if an operation originated locally or from a peer.
OperationCompletionHandler
OperationCompletionHandler applies the invalidation calls an operation recorded – locally right after the commit, and on every other host once the operation log delivers the operation. A call whose service isn't registered on the applying host is dropped by design, which is what makes a pure RPC client a no-op here: the host that owns the service replicates its own invalidations.
It is also the extension point for anything else you want to happen on completion. Register your own through CommanderBuilder.AddOperationCompletionHandler, which is how AddFusion() swaps CommandR's base handler for FusionOperationCompletionHandler:
cs
commander.AddOperationCompletionHandler(c => new MyCompletionHandler(c));One registration call wires all four things an operation's completion needs – the DI registration, the IOperationCompletionListener entry, the OperationCompletion command handler, and the alias that makes OperationCompletionHandler resolve to your type – and it replaces whatever was registered before, because a completion applied twice would invalidate twice.
Derive from FusionOperationCompletionHandler (not from the CommandR base) in a Fusion app, and override whichever of these you need:
| Member | When it runs |
|---|---|
OnOperationCompleted(operation, commandContext) | Every completed operation, local or read from the log |
OnCommand(OperationCompletion, ...) | A routed or recovered completion arriving as a command |
ApplyInvalidations(calls, handleLocally, ...) | Applies a whole batch, locally or by routing |
ApplyInvalidation(call, ...) | One call |
DropInvalidation(call, reason, ...) | A call that couldn't be applied – the hook for logging or metrics |
An ICompletion<TCommand> handler is the other way in, and the better one when what you want is tied to a specific command rather than to invalidation. See Backend Commands. Note that such a handler has to be a filter: CompletionTerminator is the one non-filter handler of every completion, and a second one is an error.
Getting Help
If you run into issues, join Fusion Place and ask questions. The author (Alex Y.) is active and happy to help.
